Remove Casing Remove Information Remove Royalty Interest
article thumbnail

CanCambria Energy Corp announces resource evaluation report for the Kiskunhalas tight-gas project, southern Hungary

Oil & Gas 360º

The company holds 100% working interest and 98% net royalty interest across the greater BA-IX mining license at the Kiskunhalas project. for un-risked case. Full FDP results in capital expenditure from CHPE (2C case) of US$947.9 million, discounted at the same 10% rate.

Gas 130
article thumbnail

Title Curative: The Key to Clear Mineral Ownership

Valor

Whether you own a single royalty interest or manage a large mineral portfolio, title curative work is essential to ensuring your ownership is properly documented and revenue flows without delay. What is Title Curative? These defects can include missing documents, unreleased liens, outdated probate records, or improperly executed deeds.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that References to “One-Eighth” in Old Oil and Gas Conveyances Presumptively Refer to the Entire Mineral Estate

The Energy Law

In the 1920s—the time the deed at issue was executed—lessors commonly reserved a one-eighth royalty interest when they executed oil and gas leases. In support of that notion, the Court cited the 1957 Texas Supreme Court case Garrett v. To receive information from Liskow & Lewis, your information will b

Royalty 98
article thumbnail

Louisiana Legislature to Consider Amendments to Forced Pooling Regime Requiring Operators to Pay Lessors of Nonparticipating Working Interest Owners Directly

The Energy Law

The current proposed bill, however, would require operators to remit all royalty payments directly to the lessors on behalf of nonparticipating working interest owners prior to well payout, i.e., during the recoupment of costs, and the statutorily authorized risk charge. Communications include firm news, insights, and events.

Royalty 98
article thumbnail

All Depths or Just One Formation? Court Clarifies Royalty Conveyance in Rock River v. Pioneer

Producer's Edge

Case Overview This recent case ( Rock River Minerals, LP v. The 1996 Assignment and Unit Agreement Michael Cass owned a 2.125% overriding royalty interest in certain leases that were part of the North Pembrook Spraberry Unit. In 1996, Cass executed an assignment conveying these interests to Pioneer's predecessor. The

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Rules on Modification of NPRIs

Producer's Edge

The Case In this recent case, the Texas Supreme Court resolved whether ratification of a lease or signing of a stipulation agreement could transform a fixed non-participating royalty interest (NPRI) into a floating NPRI. In short, the court held that mere ratification of a lease does not alter a fixed NPRI.

Royalty 59
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that Add-Back Provision in Oil and Gas Lease Required Royalties to be Paid on Prices in Excess of the Producers’ Gross Proceeds

The Energy Law

Anything to the contrary herein notwithstanding, it is expressly provided that the terms of this paragraph shall be controlling over the provisions of Paragraph 3 of this lease to the contrary and this paragraph shall not be treated as surplusage despite the holding in the cases styled “Heritage Resources, Inc. NationsBank”, 939 S.W.2d

Royalty 98