article thumbnail

PA Supremes Important Decision for Landowners re “Title Washing”

Marcellus Drilling News

In the case Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Game Commission v. Alice, get ready to go down the rabbit hole into litigation Wonderland. This post is about a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision issued on May 30, 2025. Proctor Heirs Trust, the PA Supremes addressed a question from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals regarding.

E&A 182
article thumbnail

Hino Motors, REE Automotive Agreement Aims to Remodel Commercial Mobility

NGT News

a company that specializes in e-mobility, have signed a strategic business alliance agreement to realize their shared vision of “providing new value to society through next-generation commercial mobility.” With the backdrop of advancements in CASE – connected, autonomous, shared and electric […]. Hino Motors Co.

E&A 147
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

U.S. energy sector makes strong start to 2025 – Morgan Stanley

Oil & Gas 360º

Several small and mid-cap oil producers posted weak results and soft 2025 (or 1Q) guidance, in some cases due to inventory degradation and operational noise. Overall, our price targets are moving 9% higher for gas producers, 11% lower for oil E&Ps, and -3% for integrateds. (Investing) –The U.S.

E&P 130
article thumbnail

Overturning 8 Years of “Palpable Error,” The Louisiana Supreme Court Limits Damages Available to Landowners in Oilfield Legacy Litigation

The Energy Law

The “ LL&E II ” decision finds that Act 312 charges the court, not the jury, to determine the funding needed to remediate property to government standards. 3d — (“ LL&E II ”). [1]. Background of Legacy Litigation and LL&E I . In the landmark oilfield remediation case Corbello v. LL&E II , at *2.

E&A 105
article thumbnail

Louisiana Supreme Court Grants UNOCAL’s Writ Application from Third Circuit Decision Involving Prescription and Breach of Contract in Act 312 Case

The Energy Law

Additionally, a motion to recuse was filed to remove Justice Crain from the case. Justice Crain had been previously removed from a case involving the Talbot, Carmouche, and Marcello law firm; however, in this case, the Louisiana Supreme Court denied Plaintiff’s request, allowing Justice Crain to consider the writ application.

Casing 52
article thumbnail

Climate-Related Lawsuits Continue to Return to State Courts: Understanding The Latest Ruling from District of Columbia v. Exxon Mobil Corporation

The Energy Law

Part I of this blog covers some basics about state and federal courts, explaining why the jurisdictional question of where a case will be decided is often contested. Federal Court “Removal” is the name for the process when a party transfers a case originally filed in a state court to a federal court. Only the court is different.

Casing 98
article thumbnail

“Breaking” News: Activist Org. Funded by Foundations Driving Climate Litigation Tallies Up Cases, Omits Losses

Energy Central

Last week, in what must have been a slow news cycle, outlets – including The New York Times and E&E News – reported on a new activist “report” that essentially tallied up the number of climate lawsuits in the world, leaving out a few key details in the process.

Casing 40