Remove 2021 Remove Casing Remove Royalty Interest
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Holds that References to “One-Eighth” in Old Oil and Gas Conveyances Presumptively Refer to the Entire Mineral Estate

The Energy Law

In the 1920s—the time the deed at issue was executed—lessors commonly reserved a one-eighth royalty interest when they executed oil and gas leases. In support of that notion, the Court cited the 1957 Texas Supreme Court case Garrett v. Eastland June 1, 2021). Dils Co. , 2d 904 (Tex. Element Petroleum Props.,

Royalty 98
article thumbnail

Can "Free of Cost" Term Achieve Point-of-Sale Royalty Base?

Producer's Edge

Court Interprets “Free of Cost Forever” Royalty Language Broadly In this case ( Fasken Oil & Ranch, Ltd. and Emilia Gutierrez Puig sold their ranch to Palafox Exploration Company while reserving a 1/16th non-participating royalty interest (NPRI) to be paid “free of cost forever.”

Royalty 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Rules on Modification of NPRIs

Producer's Edge

The Case In this recent case, the Texas Supreme Court resolved whether ratification of a lease or signing of a stipulation agreement could transform a fixed non-participating royalty interest (NPRI) into a floating NPRI. In short, the court held that mere ratification of a lease does not alter a fixed NPRI. 3d 226 (Tex.

Royalty 59
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Update: TRO-X Lives to Fight Another Day in Contractual Dispute over Share of Income on Production from Equitable Interests

The Energy Law

18-0983, 2021 WL 1045723, at *1 (Tex. 19, 2021) (“ Eagle II ”). The Eagle II case is the second case that arose between TRO-X, L.P. (“TRO-X”) To establish the res judicata defense, a defendant must demonstrate that the legal injury occurred before the decision was made in the first case ( i.e. , the claim was ripe).

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Empty Space? Texas Supreme Court Affirms Surface Ownership of Salt Caverns in Landmark Ruling

Producer's Edge

2021), the Court reiterated that "the surface owner, and not the mineral lessee, owns the possessory rights to the space under the property's surface." " • The Fifth Circuit similarly held for the surface owner in Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Int., Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, 520 S.W.3d 3d 39, 49 (Tex.

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Texas Supreme Court Update: TRO-X Lives to Fight Another Day in Contractual Dispute over Share of Income on Production from Equitable Interests

The Energy Law

18-0983, 2021 WL 1045723, at *1 (Tex. 19, 2021) (“ Eagle II ”). The Eagle II case is the second case that arose between TRO-X, L.P. (“TRO-X”) TRO-X and Eagle entered into an agreement to buy and sell certain leases, sharing the cash and mineral interest proceeds derived from such sales (the “Agreement”).