2011 E&A E&P 
Oil & Gas Magazine
JULY 2, 2025
El documento concluye que un cierre de Hormuz sería uno de los mayores shocks petroleros del siglo, con consecuencias globales e implicaciones estratégicas para países productores como México. Sin embargo, enfrentaría mayores costos de importación de gasolinas y diésel, lo que podría neutralizar parte del beneficio neto.
Producer's Edge
JUNE 2, 2025
Anadarko E & P Onshore, LLC, 676 S.W.3d Anadarko E& P Onshore, LLC, no. Cimarex instead chose to rely on production from several wells Anadarko drilled in 2011 and 2012. This particular species of lease washouts is based on two recent cases from the El Paso Court of Appeals – Cimarex Energy Co.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law
OCTOBER 4, 2018
El Paso E & P Co. , El Paso E & P Co. , Privacy Policy: By subscribing to Liskow & Lewis’ E-Communications, you will receive articles and blogs with insight and analysis of legal issues that may impact your industry. Alyce Gaines Johnson Special Trust v. 2d 640, 641-43 (W.D. Twin Cities Dev.
Permian Basin Oil and Gas Magazine
JUNE 23, 2025
Vertice management said that the acquisition enhances Vertices’ ability “to support wireline service providers and E&P companies with innovative tools and integrated solutions, and broadens its presence across unconventional oil and gas markets.” It’s been a momentous 2025 for the wireline niche. based RPC Inc.
The Energy Law
AUGUST 20, 2012
By Robert E. Holden and Carlos J. Moreno On August 16, 2012, EPA published a new rule that revises the NESHAP Subpart HH standards for the oil and gas industry. The Final Rule wassigned on April 17, 2012, but publication in the Federal Register did not occur until August 16, 2012, making the rule effective on October 15, 2012. . §
Producer's Edge
MAY 19, 2025
Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, 520 S.W.3d 2011), stating "Texas law establishes that the holder of a mineral estate has the right to exploit minerals, but does not own the subsurface mass." This dispute involved 160 acres in Matagorda County, Texas. Can a Cavern Be Owned? West, 508 S.W.2d 2d 812, 815 (Tex. LLC v. ."
Producer's Edge
NOVEMBER 1, 2024
Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC , 520 S.W.3d 2011), explicitly stated that the surface owner “owns all non-mineral ‘molecules’ of the land, i.e., the mass that undergirds the surface estate. The case was Myers-Woodward v. Underground Services Markham. Part I: The Battle Over Subsurface Storage Rights A.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
86 
Let's personalize your content