The Energy Law

JANUARY 31, 2020

a case previously featured on the Blog. This case began in 2011 when ETP and Enterprise explored the possibility of partnering to modify and extend, or construct anew, a pipeline to transport oil southbound from Cushing, Oklahoma. The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion today in Energy Transfer Partners, L.P

Energy 40

Energy Energy Casing Exploration and Production 40

The Energy Law

NOVEMBER 18, 2010

Under the final rule, facilities are required to begin collecting emissions data on January 1, 2011, and the first annual report is due by March 31, 2012. In that case, the emissions from the individual wells would be aggregated and treated as one “facility” for reporting purposes.

Natural Gas 40

Natural Gas Gas Petroleum Basin 40

Producer's Edge

NOVEMBER 1, 2024

The Texas Supreme Court heard oral arguments last week in a case that could substantially clarify, or even fundamentally reshape, the characterization and ownership of underground storage rights in Texas. The case was Myers-Woodward v. The case remains pending before the Texas Supreme Court on petition for review.

Royalty 52

Royalty Royalty Interest Casing Oil 52

Producer's Edge

MAY 19, 2025

Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, 520 S.W.3d 2011), stating "Texas law establishes that the holder of a mineral estate has the right to exploit minerals, but does not own the subsurface mass." This dispute involved 160 acres in Matagorda County, Texas. Second, the parties disagreed over how to calculate Myers's royalty.

Royalty 52

Royalty Casing E&A Oil 52

The Energy Law

AUGUST 20, 2012

By Robert E. Holden and Carlos J. Moreno On August 16, 2012, EPA published a new rule that revises the NESHAP Subpart HH standards for the oil and gas industry. The Final Rule wassigned on April 17, 2012, but publication in the Federal Register did not occur until August 16, 2012, making the rule effective on October 15, 2012. . §

Exploration and Production 40

Exploration and Production Gas Oil Natural Gas 40

The Energy Law

FEBRUARY 28, 2020

Huntington Ingalls, Inc. , [1] a case previously featured on the Blog , overruling “extraordinarily confused” precedent and establishing a new removal test under the Federal Officer Removal Statute, 28 U.S.C. This statute was amended in 2011 to allow removal of cases “for or relating to any act under color of [federal] office.”

Casing 52

Casing E&A Education IT 52

The Energy Law

MAY 3, 2021

The tables turned again at the Texas Supreme Court, which ultimately held that the boundary stipulation was valid and that the defendants conclusively established their ratification defense, but the case is still ongoing. Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. See 2021 WL 1432222 (Tex.

Casing 52

Casing E&A Operator IT 52

The Energy Law

MAY 3, 2021

The tables turned again at the Texas Supreme Court, which ultimately held that the boundary stipulation was valid and that the defendants conclusively established their ratification defense, but the case is still ongoing. Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. See 2021 WL 1432222 (Tex.

Exploration and Production 52

Exploration and Production Casing E&A Operator 52

The Energy Law

JANUARY 27, 2020

But in so doing, the court may have announced a new jurisdictional test with significant ramifications for future cases. So, the question on appeal was whether this was the “exceptional case” where personal jurisdiction could also be exercised in another state. The Fifth Circuit had not addressed this issue until Frank v.

E&P 40

E&P Casing E&A IT 40

The Energy Law

MARCH 31, 2021

As of 2011, after three years of review, the State Department had not approved TC’s application for a cross-border permit. Then, in December 2011, Congress passed an Act [4] requiring the President to issue the permit within 60 days, unless the President found that doing so would not serve the national interest. Constitution.

Pipeline 52

Pipeline Operator E&A Transportation 52

The Energy Law

MARCH 31, 2021

As of 2011, after three years of review, the State Department had not approved TC’s application for a cross-border permit. Then, in December 2011, Congress passed an Act [4] requiring the President to issue the permit within 60 days, unless the President found that doing so would not serve the national interest. Constitution.

Pipeline 52

Pipeline Operator E&A Transportation 52