Remove 2004 Remove E&A Remove E&P
article thumbnail

Here Comes the Rain Again - U.S. E&Ps Dial Down Capex on Growing Concerns About Future Oil Prices

RBN Energy

Over the past month, E&P executives have addressed shareholder and analyst concerns amid the murkiest market conditions since the onset of the pandemic in Q1 2020.

E&P 87
article thumbnail

Irán, el efecto Hormuz y Pemex

Oil & Gas Magazine

El documento concluye que un cierre de Hormuz sería uno de los mayores shocks petroleros del siglo, con consecuencias globales e implicaciones estratégicas para países productores como México. Sin embargo, enfrentaría mayores costos de importación de gasolinas y diésel, lo que podría neutralizar parte del beneficio neto.

E&A 107
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Fifth Circuit to Hold Oral Argument in Sojitz v. UNOCAL in April 2020

The Energy Law

2003) (“the regulations govern the parties’ joint and several liabilities vis-à-vis the Government not amongst themselves”) and Total E&P USA, Inc. Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. Union Oil Co. of California , 394 F. 3d 687 (S.D. UNOCAL assigned operating rights in the leases to ATP, who later assigned 20% of those rights to Sojitz.

Royalty 52
article thumbnail

Louisiana Second Circuit Provides Clarity on Production in Paying Quantities and Affirms Lease Cancellation Under Mineral Code Article 140 for Failure to Pay Royalties

The Energy Law

arose from a 2004 mineral lease covering nearly 1,400 acres in Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 21, Township 15 North, Range 15 West, in Caddo Parish. [2] arose from a 2004 mineral lease covering nearly 1,400 acres in Sections 9, 10, 15, 16, and 21, Township 15 North, Range 15 West, in Caddo Parish. [2] Tauren Exploration, Inc.

Royalty 40
article thumbnail

Third Circuit Issues Long-Awaited Ruling in OPA Liability Case

The Energy Law

ATHOS I had its genesis in a 2004 vessel allision and oil spill on the Delaware River between New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Procedural History The case was originally tried in a forty-one day bench trial by Judge John P. as Owner of the M/T ATHOS I , Nos. 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868 (3d Cir. 2701, et seq.

Casing 40