Division Order and Royalty Interest

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

Division Order

Royalty Interest

Affirmative Defenses Are Insufficient to Rebut the Van Dyke Presumption

Producer's Edge

APRIL 30, 2025

centered on whether a 1933 deed reserved a floating 1/4 royalty interest or a fixed 1/32 interest. Specifically, the deed’s language reserved “an undivided one-fourth (1/4th) of the usual one-eighth (1/8th) royalty.” Fasken Oil & Ranch, Ltd. , 11-22-00365-CV, 11-23-00001-CV, 2024 Tex.

Royalty Interest

Royalty Interest Royalty Division Order IT

Texas Court Subjects Override to Non-Consent Penalties

The Energy Law

MAY 24, 2007

James Boldrick is an assignee of an overriding royalty interest in property subleased to BTA. BTA, the assignor and creator of Boldrick’s interest, elected non-consent status regarding the well at issue, proposed and drilled by Chevron. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of BTA and Boldrick appealed.

Royalty Interest

Royalty Interest Royalty Division Order IT

Energy Aggregated

Affirmative Defenses Are Insufficient to Rebut the Van Dyke Presumption

Texas Court Subjects Override to Non-Consent Penalties

Stay Connected