This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The company holds 100% working interest and 98% net royaltyinterest across the greater BA-IX mining license at the Kiskunhalas project. for un-risked case. Full FDP results in capital expenditure from CHPE (2C case) of US$947.9 The CHPE best estimate for Contingent Resource volumes (2C Development Pending) is 627.4
Court Interprets “Free of Cost Forever” Royalty Language Broadly In this case ( Fasken Oil & Ranch, Ltd. Background: 1960 Deed and Royalty Dispute The dispute arose from a 1960 deed where B.A. Hyder , which also addressed a royalty provision with “cost-free” language. 30, 2024, no pet.
Case Overview This recent case ( Rock River Minerals, LP v. The 1996 Assignment and Unit Agreement Michael Cass owned a 2.125% overriding royaltyinterest in certain leases that were part of the North Pembrook Spraberry Unit. In 1996, Cass executed an assignment conveying these interests to Pioneer's predecessor. The
The Eagle II case is the second case that arose between TRO-X, L.P. (“TRO-X”) TRO-X lost that suit on appeal when the court of appeals found that TRO-X held equitable title to those interests and thus was not deprived of them. The Texas Supreme Court recently released its anticipated opinion in Eagle Oil & Gas Co.
The Eagle II case is the second case that arose between TRO-X, L.P. (“TRO-X”) TRO-X lost that suit on appeal when the court of appeals found that TRO-X held equitable title to those interests and thus was not deprived of them. The Texas Supreme Court recently released its anticipated opinion in Eagle Oil & Gas Co.
Tauren Exploration, Inc. , the Louisiana Second Circuit upheld a trial court’s ruling that the holder of a security interest in mineral leases was solidarily liable for damages under the Louisiana Mineral Code stemming from its mineral lessees/mortgagors’ actions. [1] for failure to pay royalties under Mineral Code article 140. [5]
Recently, when there was talk about Houston-based ATP Oil and Gas’ (ATP) legal problems, it was inevitably about its bankruptcy and its effort to bring the overriding royaltyinterests it had conveyed back into the bankrupt estate as debt instruments. Plans for its use or lease for exploration, development, or production activities.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content