This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The case was then transferred to Vermillion Parish, Louisiana pursuant to exceptions filed by the defendants for improper venue. The trial judge ultimately granted the exceptions and dismissed the plaintiffs’ action without prejudice on May 7, 2007. On appeal, the Third Circuit held that the actions were improperly cumulated.
In 2007, McKinsey developedâfor a Swedish utilityâthe first marginal abatement cost curve (MACC) to provide such a framework (Exhibit 1). Since 2007, MACCs and their equivalents have become widely accepted. In the initial global MACC, the abatement potential for passenger EVs by 2030 was estimated at 0.05 gigatons as of 2024.
Raven employed Michael Lee as its primary contact in negotiations with Legacy over the sale of the property involved in the case. The document was dated June 22, 2007 and it was not signed. After a negotiation period, Legacy sent a draft of a purchase agreement to Raven.
by April Rolen-Ogden This case involved a suit by an unleased landowner against an oil and gas unit operator seeking unpaid production proceeds. It is significant to note that the operator was not represented by counsel at trial, which may explain the ultimate outcome in this case.
One of the Facility Defendants removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction, arguing that complete diversity existed between all properly joined defendants and the Plaintiffs. 1] The Court found that remand was necessary in the case at issue because of the uncertainty of whether discretionary immunity under La.
The case involved a claim for misappropriation of trade secrets, in this case seismic data. The decision can be found at 2007 WL 2900510 (W.D. Excalibur, et al. , the issue presented was whether damages for loss of a lease opportunity were too speculative to survive summary judgment.
Accordingly, the district court remanded the case of LLOG Exploration Co. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s , 2007 WL 854307 (E.D. 3/16/07), to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction. 1349(B)(1). 1349(B)(1).
The Louisiana Supreme Court recently issued a decision in a downhole damages case, reversing the Third Circuit’s misguided application of the manifest error standard of review. The second, the “Hayes Lumber well”, produced the lower zone in the Nodosaria formation until 2007 when the operators ran into sanding problems. LEXIS 2530 (La.
On November 21, 2007, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s ruling in favor of Chevron U.S.A., Further, the real “cause of action” for res judicata purposes in both the Tract 87 litigation and the instant case was the immovable known as the 1938 BLD Lease, not any single tract of land contained therein.
Sundown Energy, LP , 2007 WL 1240212 ( E.D. The case concerned oil tanks on a drill site owned and operated by Sundown, which were ruptured in Hurricane Katrina. . § 2701 et seq. does not preclude a plaintiff from bringing state law claims for additional liability or compensation. Isla Corp. 4/27/07).
2007 WL 4111191 (5th Cir. As a result, the district court held that no continuing tort was at issue and the case therefore prescribed. (“TGP”) held a pipeline “easement” or “right of way” obtained in an expropriation proceeding, appealed from the district court’s dismissal of her claims against TGP as time barred by prescription.
2007-1145 (La. For another case involving the same issue of a bifurcated trial under Act 312, see Bernard v. BP America Production Company , 2007-1249 (La. In Germany v. ConocoPhillips Co. 3/5/08), — So. 4/2/08), — So.
The agencies will take public comments on implementation of the guidance until December 5, 2007. EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0282, or by email to OW-Docket@epa.gov , with the docket number in the “subject” line. United States, June 8, 2007. Comments may be submitted online at www.regulations.gov , to Docket No.
2007-2371 (La. Farms , the Court stated: In making this determination, we hasten to add that Act 312 exempts from its application all cases in which a contractual agreement exists between the parties that contains a remediation provision that exceeds state standards. I, § 4 and the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
On January 30, 2007, a class action settlement was approved in Turner v. The Turner case asserted claims for property damage resulting from a release of oil from tanks located at Murphy’s Meraux, Louisiana refinery after Hurricane Katrina. Murphy Oil U.S.A., 05-4206 (E.D. However, the parties reached settlement before trial.
A recent SWD failure case dives into critical questions of proximate cause and explores whether the reasonable prudent operator defense may shield against surface damage claims. In this case, Lee v. Investigation revealed that there was severe degradation of the well’s tubing and casing. Memorial Prod. Operating LLC , No.
497 (2007), the Supreme Court held that greenhouse gases are “pollutants” under the Clean Air Act but left open the specific question of whether greenhouse gases could be regulated under the PSD Program. In Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S.
By Marie Carlisle On May 28, 2009, the Fifth Circuit decided In the Matter of: Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation, case no. On December 12, 2007, the district court approved the cy pres distribution but, anticipating an intervention and appeal by the State, set the funds aside rather than immediately distributing them.
SunRun , founded in 2007, is a leading company in the residential solar energy sector. They offer homeowners various options to adopt solar power, such as leasing and purchasing solar panel, battery, and EV systems. SunRun became the first and only solar-plus-storage company in the U.S. to surpass one million customers.
The court’s original unanimous decision in August 2007 that a Texas premises owner can be a statutory employer for workers’ compensation purposes produced a great deal of political heat and a flurry of amicus briefs; so much so that the court departed from its normal practice and entertained oral argument on the motion for rehearing.
2007-2371 (La. On July 1, 2008, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that Act 312 of 2006 (“Act 312”) is constitutional and reversed the district court’s judgment declaring Act 312 unconstitutional and unenforceable under La. V, § 16, La. I, § 4 and the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Farms, Ltd. Exxon Mobil Corp.
By Bob Holden and Jillian Marullo On April 23, 2013, in a case of first impression, the D.C. In 2007, after a lengthy and litigious review process, the Corps, without objection from the EPA, issued a permit authorizing Mingo Coal to discharge material into three streams and their tributaries.
07-834, 2007 WL 4409686 (La. Next, the court noted the dearth of reported cases involving Mineral Code articles 212.21-23 In CLK Company, L.L.C. CXY Energy, Inc. , 12/19/07), the court addressed the payment of royalties and penalties under Mineral Code article 212.23(c) as a prerequisite to a judicial demand for damages.’” 31:212.21).
2006-G02, which requires a lessee “to show that a drilling rig was scheduled to commence operations prior to lease expiration and to have an approved plan (in this case , the EP) and APD.” In denying ATP’s request for an SOO, the MMS relied upon its Notice to Lessees No.
In Texas, for example, case law has not yet settled critical questions regarding real property rights for capture, injection, and storage such as the issue of who owns the rights to lease subsurface pore space for carbon storage when the mineral and surface estates have been severed. 585, 589 (2007). [3]
The lessees owned working interests in certain oil and gas leases that were executed in 2007. Sheppard , — S.W.3d 20-0904, 2023 WL 2438927 (Tex. The leases contained the following royalty provisions: 3. NationsBank”, 939 S.W.2d 2d 118 (Tex. 1996) and “Judice v. Mewbourne Oil Co.”, 2d [133,] 135-36 (Tex.
In Texas, for example, case law has not yet settled critical questions regarding real property rights for capture, injection, and storage such as the issue of who owns the rights to lease subsurface pore space for carbon storage when the mineral and surface estates have been severed. 585, 589 (2007). [3] 1] [link]. [2] 3] [link]. [4]
4] In 2007, Fossil Operating, Inc. between May 2007 and February 2010. [20] Notably, this is the first case in which dissolution of the lease was awarded under Article 140 since the Second Circuit’s ruling in Wegman v. There are two important points to take away from the Second Circuit’s decision in this case. Caleb J.
3d—, the Louisiana First Circuit recently reaffirmed well-settled principles regarding prescription and the subsequent purchaser doctrine in Louisiana legacy cases. In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., This opinion reinforces several key concepts in legacy cases. 5/25/21), 2021 WL 2102932, —So.
3d—, the Louisiana First Circuit recently reaffirmed well-settled principles regarding prescription and the subsequent purchaser doctrine in Louisiana legacy cases. In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., This opinion reinforces several key concepts in legacy cases. 5/25/21), 2021 WL 2102932, —So.
3d—, the Louisiana First Circuit recently reaffirmed well-settled principles regarding prescription and the subsequent purchaser doctrine in Louisiana legacy cases. In this case, Lexington Land sued Chevron U.S.A., This opinion reinforces several key concepts in legacy cases. 5/25/21), 2021 WL 2102932, —So.
Myanmar Californians are accustomed to conversations about seismically resilient construction, but the same isnt the case in some parts of Asia. Suwansawat says the 33-story, under-construction building that collapsed shouldn’t have. Some engineers are calling for further upgrades and oversight.
1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. The first tract, which covered 63 acres, was transferred through a series of agreements including an act of exchange and a subsequent cash sale in 2007. [8]
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content