This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In 2002 Hahn conveyed the tract to William and Lucille Gips, reserving an undivided one-half non-participating interest in and to all of the royalty [Hahn] now owns (same being an undivided one-half of [Hahn’s] one-fourth or an undivided one-eighth royalty) … Continue reading
The dispute in Dore centers on the interpretation of a 2002 settlement agreement between the parties to certain mineral leases in Cameron Parish. Dore Energy Corp. filed suit in 2000 against the lessees of a 1927 mineral lease seeking to cancel underdeveloped portions of the lease.
Citation 2002 Inv. Citation 2002 Inv. As is usually the case with contract interpretation, clarity and specificity are paramount. In the wake of Citation 2002, keeping all parts of the agreement in mind is essential to avoid any unintended ambiguity that might ultimately undermine the parties’ intentions.
The event has been taking place since 2002 and now draws as many as 450 exhibitors from around the world. For a full explanation of Innopipe’s specifications, industry uses and case studies of global installations we’ve already completed, please visit Innopipe.com.
The Case In this recent case, the Texas Supreme Court resolved whether ratification of a lease or signing of a stipulation agreement could transform a fixed non-participating royalty interest (NPRI) into a floating NPRI. In short, the court held that mere ratification of a lease does not alter a fixed NPRI.
The suit relies on RCRA Sections 2002(b) and 4002(b) (42 U.S.C. §§ 6912(b) and 6942(b)), which require EPA to review and, as necessary, revise RCRA regulations and guidelines for state solid waste management plans at least every three years. McCarthy , Case No. The lawsuit is styled as Environmental Integrity Project, et al.
Citation - The Latest Twist The Texas Supreme Court revisited the issue of harmonizing an assignment’s broad body and descriptive exhibits in the recent case, Occidental Permian, Ltd. Citation 2002 Inv. et al (Occidental) to a predecessor of Citation 2002 Investment LLC (Citation). LLC , 689 S.W.3d 3d 899 (Tex.
The Fifth Circuit agreed with the lower court that state statutes and case law characterize SRA-L as an arm of the state; but caveated that the factor was restricted and “given the inconsistent descriptions in the same statutes and the lack of a more-definite characterization in either statute or case law.” [7] Hawkins , 381 F.3d
The case involved a dispute between the original lessee and a top lessee. In 2002, based on Nitschke’s alleged failure to pay shut-in royalties to the proper party, Townsend, acting as Van Hovenberg’s attorney in fact, leased the 105.8 acre tract to Circle Ridge Production, Inc.
For more information on how the subsequent purchaser doctrine has been applied in legacy cases, click here.) 2002-0826 (La. Thus, the “subsequent purchaser doctrine” has become a key defense for mineral lessee defendants in legacy litigation. Amerada Hess Corporation , No. 100091, 17th JDC, Lafourche Parish. 1] Corbello v.
Relying on the case of Terrebonne Parish School Board v. 2002), the court held that contractual ambiguity in a servitude agreement requires resort to Louisiana’s suppletive servitude rules. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. , 3d 303 (5 th Cir. Castex Energy, Inc. , 2d 789 (La.
In such cases, hedge counterparties may increase calls for margin and collateral posting both in frequency and amount. In the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement this concept appears in the “force majeure” termination event, and in the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement it is often adopted as an “impossibility” additional termination event.
Factual Background The Lester suit was originally filed in 2002 in state court [2] on behalf of over 600 plaintiffs, one of whom was Mr. Cornelius Bottley, for exposure to naturally occurring radioactive materials “NORM” while working at various pipe yards. Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, Case No.
1] In the case, an operator initiated a concursus action seeking to resolve ownership interest in minerals underlying property on which it was operating. 18] In 2002, Petro-Chem, the operator, initiated proceedings to create a compulsory unit encompassing a portion of the minerals subject to the Harts’ mineral servitude. [19]
Cypress owned a majority stake in the company from 2002 to 2008. In many cases they just lease a roof from the homeowner, front cost of installation upfront and collect revenue directly from a power purchase agreement (PPA) with the utility. At the peak, SunPower accounted for more than half of Cypress revenue.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content